When I went through a divorce in the early 2000s, for the first time, I got a real close up view the family law system - and I didn't like what I saw.
As I mentioned in my post The Great Oxymoron: Family Law, I think that the system, as it functions in the United States and perhaps many other countries, is very anti family. It's a sleeping hungry lion - as long as it's a asleep, you can dance around it and have a ball. But the moment it awakens, it's ferocious and can shred you to pieces.
By the way, I'm not speaking against family law attorneys. I had a pretty good one myself and I personally know some who do read and follow The Upbeat Dad and think it's great. I'm just referring to the fundamentals of the system - the industry, if you will. It does not promote reconciliation but rather, further division.
It seemed to me that it was just a mathematical calculation. I'm a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and I do many mathematical formulas for calculating income taxes and payroll deductions. So seeing the way the calculation works reminded me of my daily work.
The calculation, I think, is fair. It takes into account the income of both parents. And it seeks to ensure that the children are adequately supported. The non-custodial parent writes a check to the custodial parent for the portion that applies to him or her. That's quite good, I believe.
Now here's my issue with the whole concept. Some fathers go into court and walk away with the belief that as long as you pay child support you're a good dad. And unfortunately, the court helps to convey that message. So you can be a loving dad who's close to your kids - and then you're divorced or otherwise separated and then your support for your kids is reduced to a bi-weekly check? That's not right.
I know fathers who live locally and see their kids sparingly. But they always pay their child support. And as far as the court is concerned, they're good dads.
In my mediation, I ended up losing so much. But one thing I would not compromise on was time with my then 3 year old daughter. I refused to reduce the role that I played in her life to a payroll deduction or a check that I write. What about quality time? What about helping to teach her right from wrong? What about helping with her homework as she starts school?
You cannot adequately function as a parent when the only contact with your child is every other weekend. It's more like you're a member of the extended family who sees the kids and plays with them and sends them home to the place where life lessons and discipline are taught.
I don't even mind the "every other weekend" visitation concept all that much as long as the non-custodial parent is always in contact with the kids. If you see your kids every other weekend or if you live in different cities and you only see them every few months, always be in contact with them. With technology today, there are so many ways and means to be involved in their lives.
A good dad, in the eyes of the legal system, pays his child support and sees his kids every 2 weeks. An upbeat dad, on the other hand, not only pays his child support, but also tries to get more time with the kids. And he also is in constant contact with them.
I even remember when my daughter lived with my ex in New York, I not only called her daily, but I went over her homework with her on the phone. Sometimes those calls would last over an hour. And to me that was time well spent. Now that she lives with my wife and me, I invest even more time in her life, knowing that my "child support" is a lifetime commitment.
I don't know how things may be in your life today. Perhaps you've been disillusioned by a system that says you're a good dad but you're losing that essential connection to your kids. I have often said, "What's a 4 letter word that let's your kids know you love them? T-I-M-E."
I encourage you to learn this very important lesson. The bond I have with my daughter today didn't come accidentally. If you devote yourself to your kids unconditionally, then it will pay lifetime dividends.